Nubert Lautsprecher, HiFi- und Surround-Elektronik

caine2011 hat geschrieben: das 2te argument für die xmc-1 sind für mcih die netzwerkfunktionen...

caine2011 hat geschrieben:naja...man kann jetzt app steuerung benutzen und audio streamen, ergo derselbe komfort wie bei den großen herstellern

I've posted this before, but it keeps coming up and I feel people are minimizing the differences between the UMC and XMC. Here's my UNOFFICIAL comparison of the feature differences - made by using the product sheets, EmoFest reports, and pictures.

So going from UMC-200 to XMC-1 you get:
- X Series build quality, metalwork, components, and Tiffany connectors (point XMC)
- Balanced 7.2 XLR on XMC vs Single ended 7.1 RCA on 200 (point XMC)
- TaCT on the XMC vs EmoQ 2 on 200 (expected point XMC)
- Bluetooth on 200 (point UMC - optional)
- 7 HDMI XMC vs 4 HDMI 200 (point XMC)
- Bigger OLED Display on XMC (point XMC)
- TI chipset XMC vs Cirrus on 500 (probably point XMC)
- USB stick firmware update on XMC vs PC/USB cable on 200 (point XMC)
- Reference quality Analog input (XLR & RCA) on XMC (point XMC)
- Network IP control & setup on XMC (can I give this 50 XMC points ;~)
- Streaming network audio on XMC - details unknown? (point XMC)
- USB Audio/Driver on XMC (point XMC)
- "Flexible & Expandable Platform" on XMC (unproven, possible XMC point)
- AES/EBU input on XMC (point XMC)
- 3 digital in (TOSLink & coax) on XMC vs 2 digital in on 200 (point XMC)
- Digital Out (TOSLink & coax) on XMC (point XMC)
- Rec Out on XMC-1 (possible point XMC)
- True analog "Tape Loop" on XMC (point XMC)
- 4 (programmable?) trigger outs on XMC vs 1 trigger on 200 (point XMC)

The problem is the source device at this point...

Lots of 4k displays with varying degrees of 4k'ness and essentially no sources... Unless you want to call the Sony HD drive a "player". It is NOT a legitimate source. It is a marketing tool, IMO.

The interface to the display is proprietary and can only be used on a companion Sony product. Great for the guy who wants to say he has 4k, but it is not commercially viable. We've got a way to go until we have a real standard and commercial availability of source components and media. No need to get hung up on 2.0, we've got bigger fish to fry!

Don't get me started on HDCP 2.2... Another battleground.

Us Emovite's can sit back and wait for the dust to settle and then we'll make the switch to whatever wins.

If you've got a 4 k display enjoy it and plan to wait a while for 4k sources and content that are meaningful.
Cheers,
big Dan

MGM hat geschrieben:Aus der BDA zum Fusion 8100:

The main channels each provide 11 bands of parametric equalization, and the subwoofer channels each provide 3 bands.

Verstehe ich momentan so, dass die Surround Backs keine PEQ Filter haben... Als Main werden doch bei der Umc 200 auch nur Front+Surround (5 Kanäle) bezeichnet, oder?